Explanation Regarding Ping0 and ipjiance Query Results
Recently, we have received feedback from some users stating that certain third-party IP checking platforms have labeled our IP addresses with conclusions such as “blacklisted,” “not recommended,” or “IDC data center IP.” After review, we found that some platforms’ displayed results are clearly misleading, as they may mix their own self-created risk-control rules, user query behavior, and advertising content with the actual IP blacklist status.
Using the IP address shown in this announcement as an example, ipjiance displays that it has been “blacklisted by many platforms,” but the actual public database results are as follows:
-
AbuseIPDB shows: 0 reports and a 0% abuse confidence score
-
HetrixTools blacklist history monitoring shows: 0 blacklist records
-
Check.Place multi-platform database checking shows: 439 valid database checks, with 0 blacklists
- Check.Place also shows that major US streaming services, AI services, and forums are fully unlocked
The above results show that this IP does not have the so-called issue of being “blacklisted by many platforms.” The red warnings, risk labels, or “not recommended” conclusions shown by individual checking websites do not represent authoritative database results, nor can they directly prove that there is any quality issue with the IP.
Regarding the Ping0 platform, we would also like to provide a specific clarification. According to a public community experiment, some of Ping0’s IP type labels may be affected by query frequency, query source, and sample behavior. There was even a case where “using the same IP to query itself, after multiple queries, the label changed from data center IP to residential IP.” The related experiment link is as follows: https://linux.do/t/topic/942959
At the same time, there are also many reports and discussions online regarding the possibility of Ping0 pages leaking WebRTC information. Therefore, we do not recommend using Ping0’s single checking result as the basis for judging IP type, IP quality, or after-sales handling.
To avoid being misled by a single platform, we recommend that users use multi-platform cross-checking for verification. You may run the following command to check by yourself:
bash <(curl -Ls https://Check.Place) -I
Users may also refer to IPLark, IPinfo, AbuseIPDB, HetrixTools, and other platforms with clearer sources and more transparent results as supplementary references. For NovixLink after-sales handling, the judgment of IP information, IP ownership, IP type, and IP quality has always been primarily based on IPinfo results. This is also consistent with the IP judgment standard displayed on our product purchase pages.
For statements such as “blacklisted,” “data center IP,” or “not recommended” generated by ipjiance, Ping0, and similar platforms based on unilateral labels, advertising-style prompts, or opaque risk-control scores, NovixLink will not use them as the basis for after-sales judgment, nor will we determine that an IP has a quality issue based only on such results. We ask all users to view third-party IP checking platform results rationally. Whether an IP has an issue should be determined based on public databases, multi-platform cross-checking, and reproducible results, rather than the eye-catching titles or unilateral labels of individual websites.
Thank you for your business,
NovixLink
